Understanding abandonment – how thoughtful ‘checkout’ design pays dividends

I’ve been doing a lot of my shopping online recently and it has gotten me thinking about the opportunities for designing ecommerce systems that we often don’t bother spending time on. We just plug in ‘off the shelf’ solutions and this means that all too often we’re not thinking about ways that we can design the shopping experience so that it better supports the way that people actually want to shop online.

It seems from many online shopping experiences that there is an assumption that the online shopping experience has just a few simple steps:

  1. locate the product you want to purchase
  2. select that product (put it in the basket)
  3. pay for the product and arrange delivery

Although, for some people some of the time, the process is this simple, very often there are much more complex pathways that people take when shopping – both online and offline. Unfortunately, very often the design of online systems doesn’t support this additional complexity. Very often just a few small changes would make a great difference.

Here are just a few examples I’ve come across lately.

Scenario: I’m in the market, but I’m not quite ready to buy.
Design requirement: Save shopping basket

There are many reasons why people don’t quite complete a transaction, but one that I find is really very common is this one… I’m just not quite ready to buy yet. It could be that it’s a large transaction and I need to be completely certain that I want to buy it, it could be that I’m comparing your product or price or service with your competitors, but quite often I’ll do the first and second stages of the shopping process – locating products and putting them in the trolley – but not be quite ready to give you my payment details.

It is amazing how many e-commerce systems ‘forget’ all the shopping I’ve done – some apparently deliberately, with time out error messages to boot. This means that, when I come back with my credit card out and ready to shop, I have to start all over again – finding the products and putting them back into the basket. Depending on the size of your product range and the state of your information architecture, this can sometimes be a particularly daunting task – daunting enough to perhaps result in abandonment.
Where is the value to anyone in ‘forgetting’ what’s in my basket? Who benefits from this? Certainly not your customer who has to go to extra effort when they return to make their purchase, and not the business either, who will almost certainly be losing revenue as a result of this design decision.

Amazon (predictably) are a great example of how not to forget what’s gone in the basket – their ‘buy later’ functionality means that I can even choose to not buy something that is in the basket and *still* not have it deleted or forgotten. Amazon is an excellent example of how to manage this ‘remembering’ – but many small ecommerce sites have similar functionality – you don’t have to be Amazon to be able to do this.

It will take a little more technical effort and design work to manage this ‘saving’ of the basket but it should definitely be the default for all e-commerce systems.

Scenario: I’m in the market, but I’m not quite motivated to buy.
Design requirement: Follow up and provide incentive

I also call this one ‘The Almost Impulse Buy’ – again, the customer goes almost all the way through the purchasing process but pulls out just as it comes time to commit with their wallet. There are a lot of reasons why people don’t quite go through with the purchase, but three surprisingly common ones are:

  1. they simply forget! – surprisingly, buying your products is not the only and most important thing that your customer is dealing with. Other more important stuff comes up, they get distracted – and they quite simply forget that they were ever just about to hand over some of their hard earned cash to you. They move on and don’t make it back.
  2. they need just a little more reason to buy – it could be that they don’t really *need* your product, or that they don’t really need to buy it from you, or that they feel as though they should do a little more research or wait a little time before buying – there is not quite enough motivation for them to complete the purchase at that time.
  3. something you’re doing sucks – it could be that something is broken, a question is not answered, or something about your product or service just doesn’t quite match your customers needs… this is unresolved and, as a result, so is this transaction.

Each of these ‘problems’ has a very similar solution – get in touch! Drop me an email, tell me you’ve noticed that I didn’t quite complete my purchase, ask me if something was wrong, give me an alternative method to purchase (a return email, a phone number) or a way to tell you what was wrong, give me an incentive to complete the purchase now.

Recently I almost purchased a hamper online at Fortnum & Mason – about 24hours after I *didn’t* complete the transaction I received an email from them letting me know that they’d noticed, asking me if there was a problem and telling me that if I *did* complete the purchase they’d put me in a draw to win an enormous hamper for free. Nice work.

Other smaller sites have sent me emails that seem to me to be human generated – one even had a little note telling me that something I had almost purchased was now available as a special deal. Perhaps they’re hand done, perhaps they’re automated, the end result is a little warm fuzzy for the customer – you noticed that they didn’t go through with the purchase and you care enough to find out why and to try to win their business. For the small amount of effort that this would require, it wouldn’t take very many conversions to make this time and money well spent.

Scenario: I’m just researching but information I need is buried in your purchasing process
Design requirement: Make desired information more easily accessible to your customers outside of the purchasing process.

Sometimes abandonment isn’t actually abandonment… sometimes it’s just research that can’t be done any other way. Understanding delivery charges and timeframes is an example you’ve probably come across before – you can’t find out about what delivery options are available without going through the process of purchasing, even though you’re not at all committed to that purchase. I once had a client who had a geographically restricted service, but the only way you could find out if that service was available to you was to commence the purchase transaction where step three was ‘put in your postcode to find out if we can provide service in your location’. These things sound pretty dumb and obvious, but you run into them all the time. Meanwhile, back at corporate HQ, people are wondering why shopping baskets are being abandoned at step three…

As well as making it easier for your customers, providing this information outside of the transactional process also helps you get more accurate numbers on the effectiveness of your design – those customers who are just going through the motions to get the information shouldn’t be counted as abandonments at all – in many cases, this results in undue resources being spent on redesigning step three, when, in fact, the real problems that cause committed customers to drop out are somewhere else entirely.

So – just a few of my favourite ways that you could potentially make some small changes and reap almost immediate benefits for your e-commerce business. I’d be interested to hear of any other basket/checkout related bugbears you have and how they should be addressed by user experience designers.

6 thoughts on “Understanding abandonment – how thoughtful ‘checkout’ design pays dividends

  1. Another feature that addresses scenarios 1 and 2 is a click to chat button.

    Often people abandon online sales becasue they have one or more niggling doubts; “Is this the best deal I can get?” or “Does the product have this feature?”

    (For this second sceanario, no matter how clear you descriptions are, there are always custmers who think different.)

    So – put on a live chat button for people to ask questions or discuss comparisons.

    Of course you have to staff the service, but you can outsource that to someone who is already proving the service to others on a per contact basis.

    …anyway… ramble over…

  2. The main reason online merchants sometimes don’t persist cart contents after the shopper leaves the site is that it takes up a lot of memory which requires more hardware in the back office. Wise merchants do as you say because it pays off, but not all of them are that wise.

    Full disclosure: I work for ATG (www.atg.com). We provide the number one analyst rated eCommerce platform. A good platform provides support for persistent carts and for trigger-based campaigns like sending a follow-up email with a promotion and/or contact information when a cart is abandoned.

    It also provides the design flexibility to provide all the necessary information shoppers need to make up their minds before entering the purchase process.

    Through our eStara division, ATG also provides Click-to-Call and Click-to-Chat services that you can add to any site. Interestingly, these are used less for generic customer service and more for maximizing conversion (as Craig indicates) by answering last minute questions when people hesitate on the checkout page.

    Another great service for maximizing conversion and cart size is recommendations. Looking at a hat? How about matching gloves? Like this book? How about this one by the same author? Sometimes these recommendations turn into add-on sales and sometimes they are ways of suggesting just the right thing when what the customer is looking at now is not quite right.

    Just to complete the commercial here, ATG recently acquired a company called CleverSet that provides some of the most sophisticated statistically-derived recommendations in the business.

  3. Very good points. A great side point to saving the shopping cart is if you won’t be doing the purchasing yourself, particularly in a business environment. Most businesses separate the responsibilities of choosing a product from paying for the product. So while I may be the one to find what needs to be purchased, the person doing the transaction is going to be someone else. An easy way to store the shopping cart for another user is essential.

    And to address the issue of a followup with a potential customer, there are a few considerations to be made here. In order to be able to email a customer you need to have their email address first. I, personally, am not going to bother signing up for site unless I absolutely have to. I make use of a “guest checkout” whenever possible. So, in that scenario, you don’t have a way to get in touch with the customer.

    The other issue is privacy. Some people may not WANT to be followed up with. But if you have people make this choice at some point, it’s an extra step in the signup process, which makes it that much less likely that it will be filled out. It’s certainly not a bad idea, and, unfortunately, I don’t have a solution to propose. But I do think these are important considerations to take into account when thinking about issues like this.

  4. […] In no particular order or categorisation  – Adam Crowe, Amelia Torode, Mark Earls, Ruth Gledhill, Damian Thompson, Brian Robertson, Pat Kane, Zeroinfluencer, Kiminder Bedi, Kate Orr, Leisa Reichelt, Rev Dorothy Micklethwaite, Alex and Tim Horlock, Jonathan Bartley, Adam Riggins, Helen Thompson […]

  5. […] Adam Crowe, Amelia Torode, Mark Earls, Ruth Gledhill, Damian Thompson, Brian Robertson, Pat Kane, Kiminder Bedi, Kate Orr, Leisa Reichelt, Rev Dorothy Micklethwaite, Alex and Tim Horlock, Jonathan Bartley, Adam Riggins, Helen Thompson, Rev Mandy Hodgson […]

Comments are closed.