<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Social Project Management at Enterprise 2.0</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.disambiguity.com/social-project-management-at-enterprise-20/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.disambiguity.com/social-project-management-at-enterprise-20/</link>
	<description>pretty design pending</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 06 Jul 2008 06:35:26 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Bruce P. Henry</title>
		<link>http://www.disambiguity.com/social-project-management-at-enterprise-20/#comment-104126</link>
		<dc:creator>Bruce P. Henry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jun 2008 20:07:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.disambiguity.com/social-project-management-at-enterprise-20/#comment-104126</guid>
		<description>First off I want to congratulate you on your lack of bullet point lists.  I can't begin to say how refreshing it is to see a presentation on project management without a hail of bullet points.

As I see it the promise of social project management comes from acknowledging that projects (particularly large projects) are a social activity. People doing work with people, for other people, with commitments to yet other people. The more people (i.e. larger projects), the more interpersonal interactions, the more social effects inside of the project.

The focus on Gantt Charts as an example of something that just doesn't work is interesting.  It turns out that there is a mathematical reason that Gantt Charts the way they are done today just don't work (when I get a post for this I'll link here).

This comment is already rather long so I've blogged a detailed response on &lt;a href="http://www.liquidplanner.com/blog/2008/06/23/social-project-management-in-large-projects" rel="nofollow"&gt;Social Project Management in Large Projects&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First off I want to congratulate you on your lack of bullet point lists.  I can&#8217;t begin to say how refreshing it is to see a presentation on project management without a hail of bullet points.</p>
<p>As I see it the promise of social project management comes from acknowledging that projects (particularly large projects) are a social activity. People doing work with people, for other people, with commitments to yet other people. The more people (i.e. larger projects), the more interpersonal interactions, the more social effects inside of the project.</p>
<p>The focus on Gantt Charts as an example of something that just doesn&#8217;t work is interesting.  It turns out that there is a mathematical reason that Gantt Charts the way they are done today just don&#8217;t work (when I get a post for this I&#8217;ll link here).</p>
<p>This comment is already rather long so I&#8217;ve blogged a detailed response on <a href="http://www.liquidplanner.com/blog/2008/06/23/social-project-management-in-large-projects" rel="nofollow">Social Project Management in Large Projects</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: People Over Process &#187; links for 2007-06-27</title>
		<link>http://www.disambiguity.com/social-project-management-at-enterprise-20/#comment-21930</link>
		<dc:creator>People Over Process &#187; links for 2007-06-27</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jun 2007 07:24:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.disambiguity.com/social-project-management-at-enterprise-20/#comment-21930</guid>
		<description>[...] Social Project Management at Enterprise 2.0 (tags: prjmgmt agile presentations via:aqualung) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Social Project Management at Enterprise 2.0 (tags: prjmgmt agile presentations via:aqualung) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
