<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ms Dewey &#8211; Lessons in how NOT to design a search engine, brought to you by Microsoft</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.disambiguity.com/ms-dewey-lessons-in-how-not-to-design-a-search-engine-brought-to-you-by-microsoft/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.disambiguity.com/ms-dewey-lessons-in-how-not-to-design-a-search-engine-brought-to-you-by-microsoft/</link>
	<description>Observing, reflecting, designing.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 23:14:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: dan mirante</title>
		<link>http://www.disambiguity.com/ms-dewey-lessons-in-how-not-to-design-a-search-engine-brought-to-you-by-microsoft/comment-page-1/#comment-62735</link>
		<dc:creator>dan mirante</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2008 16:11:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.disambiguity.com/2006/10/21/ms-dewey-lessons-in-how-not-to-design-a-search-engine-brought-to-you-by-microsoft/#comment-62735</guid>
		<description>Its just an experiment... I don&#039;t think they were aiming for anything other than an exploration of the technology and the medium. Its obviously aimed as a niche piece...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Its just an experiment&#8230; I don&#8217;t think they were aiming for anything other than an exploration of the technology and the medium. Its obviously aimed as a niche piece&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: leisa.reichelt</title>
		<link>http://www.disambiguity.com/ms-dewey-lessons-in-how-not-to-design-a-search-engine-brought-to-you-by-microsoft/comment-page-1/#comment-25478</link>
		<dc:creator>leisa.reichelt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Jul 2007 07:24:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.disambiguity.com/2006/10/21/ms-dewey-lessons-in-how-not-to-design-a-search-engine-brought-to-you-by-microsoft/#comment-25478</guid>
		<description>she&#039;s a search engine, Donald - so I think she&#039;s got some functional responsibilities in that area.

I&#039;d have no problem if she was a search engine that worked reasonably well AND was entertaining. Although, I don&#039;t think I&#039;m directly in the target audience for this kind of entertainment.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>she&#8217;s a search engine, Donald &#8211; so I think she&#8217;s got some functional responsibilities in that area.</p>
<p>I&#8217;d have no problem if she was a search engine that worked reasonably well AND was entertaining. Although, I don&#8217;t think I&#8217;m directly in the target audience for this kind of entertainment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Donald</title>
		<link>http://www.disambiguity.com/ms-dewey-lessons-in-how-not-to-design-a-search-engine-brought-to-you-by-microsoft/comment-page-1/#comment-25457</link>
		<dc:creator>Donald</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Jul 2007 01:38:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.disambiguity.com/2006/10/21/ms-dewey-lessons-in-how-not-to-design-a-search-engine-brought-to-you-by-microsoft/#comment-25457</guid>
		<description>I like Ms. Dewey.  The interactive part is far from perfect but, you have to start somewhere.  People get a life, she is for entertainment.  Can you do any better?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like Ms. Dewey.  The interactive part is far from perfect but, you have to start somewhere.  People get a life, she is for entertainment.  Can you do any better?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://www.disambiguity.com/ms-dewey-lessons-in-how-not-to-design-a-search-engine-brought-to-you-by-microsoft/comment-page-1/#comment-6876</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Nov 2006 22:01:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.disambiguity.com/2006/10/21/ms-dewey-lessons-in-how-not-to-design-a-search-engine-brought-to-you-by-microsoft/#comment-6876</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s certainly different!!  I went fot the conversational approach, but the search engine worked fine but gave me different results to the MSN Search. (yes, I was sad and checked it).

Some improvements are needed (Speed, sassy attitude, display of results), and it is probably just a &#039;fad&#039; but interesting and different is good.  Shame people don&#039;t like change though...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s certainly different!!  I went fot the conversational approach, but the search engine worked fine but gave me different results to the MSN Search. (yes, I was sad and checked it).</p>
<p>Some improvements are needed (Speed, sassy attitude, display of results), and it is probably just a &#8216;fad&#8217; but interesting and different is good.  Shame people don&#8217;t like change though&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cheryl</title>
		<link>http://www.disambiguity.com/ms-dewey-lessons-in-how-not-to-design-a-search-engine-brought-to-you-by-microsoft/comment-page-1/#comment-6860</link>
		<dc:creator>Cheryl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Nov 2006 22:08:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.disambiguity.com/2006/10/21/ms-dewey-lessons-in-how-not-to-design-a-search-engine-brought-to-you-by-microsoft/#comment-6860</guid>
		<description>ahhh I hated the scrolling in the results - I did a search and had about 20,000 results, but they only showed 3 or 4 at a time, so I had to scroll through. 

I like that they tried to be different and &quot;rethink search&quot; but when I do a search it&#039;s for a specific purpose, I want to find something. If I want to be entertained, I&#039;ll do it another time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ahhh I hated the scrolling in the results &#8211; I did a search and had about 20,000 results, but they only showed 3 or 4 at a time, so I had to scroll through. </p>
<p>I like that they tried to be different and &#8220;rethink search&#8221; but when I do a search it&#8217;s for a specific purpose, I want to find something. If I want to be entertained, I&#8217;ll do it another time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: leisa.reichelt</title>
		<link>http://www.disambiguity.com/ms-dewey-lessons-in-how-not-to-design-a-search-engine-brought-to-you-by-microsoft/comment-page-1/#comment-6857</link>
		<dc:creator>leisa.reichelt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Nov 2006 17:24:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.disambiguity.com/2006/10/21/ms-dewey-lessons-in-how-not-to-design-a-search-engine-brought-to-you-by-microsoft/#comment-6857</guid>
		<description>I finally got some search results out of Ms Dewey today... what do we think of the scrolling in the search results? I quite like it!

(See!... I&#039;m not a &lt;a rel=&quot;nofollow&quot; href=&quot;http://www.mynameiskate.ca/2006/11/ms_dewey_can_yo.html&quot;&gt;curmudgeon criticising because I don&#039;t like innovation!&lt;/a&gt;)

If it was my site I&#039;d have the URL as links as well as the title for each results... it&#039;s weird seeing a URL and not being able to click it!

The Easter Eggs in this site have also generated a whole lot of blogging/searching interest... so it&#039;s a great example of effectively using easter eggs to create intrigue and possibly even some kind of community.

The best list of Easter Eggs that I found is &lt;a target=&quot;_blank&quot; title=&quot;Digg - Ms Dewey&quot; href=&quot;http://digg.com/design/MsDewey_com_New_Interactive_Flash_Search_Engine&quot;&gt;on Digg (of course)&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I finally got some search results out of Ms Dewey today&#8230; what do we think of the scrolling in the search results? I quite like it!</p>
<p>(See!&#8230; I&#8217;m not a <a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.mynameiskate.ca/2006/11/ms_dewey_can_yo.html">curmudgeon criticising because I don&#8217;t like innovation!</a>)</p>
<p>If it was my site I&#8217;d have the URL as links as well as the title for each results&#8230; it&#8217;s weird seeing a URL and not being able to click it!</p>
<p>The Easter Eggs in this site have also generated a whole lot of blogging/searching interest&#8230; so it&#8217;s a great example of effectively using easter eggs to create intrigue and possibly even some kind of community.</p>
<p>The best list of Easter Eggs that I found is <a target="_blank" title="Digg - Ms Dewey" href="http://digg.com/design/MsDewey_com_New_Interactive_Flash_Search_Engine">on Digg (of course)</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: leisa.reichelt</title>
		<link>http://www.disambiguity.com/ms-dewey-lessons-in-how-not-to-design-a-search-engine-brought-to-you-by-microsoft/comment-page-1/#comment-6852</link>
		<dc:creator>leisa.reichelt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Oct 2006 09:14:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.disambiguity.com/2006/10/21/ms-dewey-lessons-in-how-not-to-design-a-search-engine-brought-to-you-by-microsoft/#comment-6852</guid>
		<description>yep, that&#039;s exactly the kind of thing I&#039;m talking about Cheryl. Who needs to be hounded by a search engine - AT THE WRONG TIME! (if there&#039;s ever a good time to be hounded by and pouted at by a search engine... I&#039;m not sure)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yep, that&#8217;s exactly the kind of thing I&#8217;m talking about Cheryl. Who needs to be hounded by a search engine &#8211; AT THE WRONG TIME! (if there&#8217;s ever a good time to be hounded by and pouted at by a search engine&#8230; I&#8217;m not sure)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cheryl</title>
		<link>http://www.disambiguity.com/ms-dewey-lessons-in-how-not-to-design-a-search-engine-brought-to-you-by-microsoft/comment-page-1/#comment-6851</link>
		<dc:creator>Cheryl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Oct 2006 05:35:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.disambiguity.com/2006/10/21/ms-dewey-lessons-in-how-not-to-design-a-search-engine-brought-to-you-by-microsoft/#comment-6851</guid>
		<description>Hey I see what you mean - it took over a minute to load from a work connection, then about 55 seconds to actually do a search. Then when I was scrolling through the search results, she kept tapping the screen and rolling her eyes and saying &quot;C&#039;mon, type something here&quot; and getting pissed off cos I was reading results. 

I couldn&#039;t wait to leave the site! What a terrible user experience.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey I see what you mean &#8211; it took over a minute to load from a work connection, then about 55 seconds to actually do a search. Then when I was scrolling through the search results, she kept tapping the screen and rolling her eyes and saying &#8220;C&#8217;mon, type something here&#8221; and getting pissed off cos I was reading results. </p>
<p>I couldn&#8217;t wait to leave the site! What a terrible user experience.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: leisa.reichelt</title>
		<link>http://www.disambiguity.com/ms-dewey-lessons-in-how-not-to-design-a-search-engine-brought-to-you-by-microsoft/comment-page-1/#comment-6840</link>
		<dc:creator>leisa.reichelt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Oct 2006 09:02:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.disambiguity.com/2006/10/21/ms-dewey-lessons-in-how-not-to-design-a-search-engine-brought-to-you-by-microsoft/#comment-6840</guid>
		<description>hey Pakeha,

If I&#039;d have just said &#039;I don&#039;t like it&#039; then I think your point would be fair...  and as I said, I&#039;m really keen to explore new ways of approaching search - in fact, I&#039;d say it&#039;s one of my special interests.

But there is no point positively supporting something that, by my estimation, is just heading completely down the wrong path in terms of supporting seaching tasks for users AND which is also potentially insulting for a significant proportion of the internet audience.

I&#039;m disappointed that this project wasn&#039;t thought through more thoroughly, not that they tried something new and different.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hey Pakeha,</p>
<p>If I&#8217;d have just said &#8216;I don&#8217;t like it&#8217; then I think your point would be fair&#8230;  and as I said, I&#8217;m really keen to explore new ways of approaching search &#8211; in fact, I&#8217;d say it&#8217;s one of my special interests.</p>
<p>But there is no point positively supporting something that, by my estimation, is just heading completely down the wrong path in terms of supporting seaching tasks for users AND which is also potentially insulting for a significant proportion of the internet audience.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m disappointed that this project wasn&#8217;t thought through more thoroughly, not that they tried something new and different.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pakeha</title>
		<link>http://www.disambiguity.com/ms-dewey-lessons-in-how-not-to-design-a-search-engine-brought-to-you-by-microsoft/comment-page-1/#comment-6837</link>
		<dc:creator>pakeha</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Oct 2006 00:24:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.disambiguity.com/2006/10/21/ms-dewey-lessons-in-how-not-to-design-a-search-engine-brought-to-you-by-microsoft/#comment-6837</guid>
		<description>Why is it when something different is tried the Tech Press/commentators provide only negative feed back?
because it is easier that working and thinking?
Shame</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why is it when something different is tried the Tech Press/commentators provide only negative feed back?<br />
because it is easier that working and thinking?<br />
Shame</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

