<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: links for 25 January 2006 &#8211; Agile Interaction Design</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.disambiguity.com/links-for-2007-01-25/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.disambiguity.com/links-for-2007-01-25/</link>
	<description>pretty design pending</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Feb 2010 23:30:46 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: dancingmango &#187; What if it began with UAT? (Agile and interaction design are compatible!)</title>
		<link>http://www.disambiguity.com/links-for-2007-01-25/comment-page-1/#comment-9340</link>
		<dc:creator>dancingmango &#187; What if it began with UAT? (Agile and interaction design are compatible!)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Feb 2007 10:03:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.disambiguity.com/links-for-2007-01-25/#comment-9340</guid>
		<description>[...] There&#8217;s an argument brewing that pitches the agile community against the interaction design community. (You get a feel for this here via here ). Personally I don&#8217;t get it. The two approaches are a natural fit. You just need a bit of pragmatism and an ability to say &#8220;it depends&#8221;. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] There&#8217;s an argument brewing that pitches the agile community against the interaction design community. (You get a feel for this here via here ). Personally I don&#8217;t get it. The two approaches are a natural fit. You just need a bit of pragmatism and an ability to say &#8220;it depends&#8221;. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
