Comments on: links for 14 July 2006 http://www.disambiguity.com/links-for-2006-06-14/ Observing, reflecting, designing. Thu, 09 Feb 2012 06:22:44 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: Kazellac http://www.disambiguity.com/links-for-2006-06-14/comment-page-1/#comment-247236 Kazellac Tue, 28 Apr 2009 16:14:52 +0000 http://www.disambiguity.com/2006/06/links-for-2006-06-14/#comment-247236 Hi webmaster! xtc Hi webmaster! xtc

]]> By: Kazeldzn http://www.disambiguity.com/links-for-2006-06-14/comment-page-1/#comment-247172 Kazeldzn Tue, 28 Apr 2009 14:04:48 +0000 http://www.disambiguity.com/2006/06/links-for-2006-06-14/#comment-247172 Hi webmaster! xbl Hi webmaster! xbl

]]> By: John S. Rhodes http://www.disambiguity.com/links-for-2006-06-14/comment-page-1/#comment-1500 John S. Rhodes Tue, 20 Jun 2006 02:59:39 +0000 http://www.disambiguity.com/2006/06/links-for-2006-06-14/#comment-1500 I love seeing the tags you've used: language and memory. Why not psychology, webword, attention, and research? Do you already use these tags for other material? Are these totally new tags or does my posting just what predefined buckets? The good things about tags is that they are so bottoms up. Tags and clouds and whatnot simply emerge. The downside is that structure and organization only becomes evident when many users contribute. Until that happens, you've got noise. I need to re-read these articles: Ontology is Overrated: Categories, Links, and Tags http://www.shirky.com/writings/ontology_overrated.html Market populism in the folksonomies debate http://atomiq.org/archives/2005/04/market_populism_in_the_folksonomies_debate.html Semi-structured meta-data has a posse: A response to Gene Smith http://tagsonomy.com/index.php/semi-structured-meta-data-has-a-posse-a-response-to-gene-smith/ Have you seen all of these? I love seeing the tags you’ve used: language and memory. Why not psychology, webword, attention, and research? Do you already use these tags for other material? Are these totally new tags or does my posting just what predefined buckets?

The good things about tags is that they are so bottoms up. Tags and clouds and whatnot simply emerge. The downside is that structure and organization only becomes evident when many users contribute. Until that happens, you’ve got noise.

I need to re-read these articles:

Ontology is Overrated: Categories, Links, and Tags
http://www.shirky.com/writings/ontology_overrated.html

Market populism in the folksonomies debate
http://atomiq.org/archives/2005/04/market_populism_in_the_folksonomies_debate.html

Semi-structured meta-data has a posse: A response to Gene Smith
http://tagsonomy.com/index.php/semi-structured-meta-data-has-a-posse-a-response-to-gene-smith/

Have you seen all of these?

]]>