Comments on: links for 26 May 2006 http://www.disambiguity.com/links-for-2006-05-26/ pretty design pending Tue, 06 Jan 2009 00:19:56 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2 By: leisa.reichelt http://www.disambiguity.com/links-for-2006-05-26/#comment-965 leisa.reichelt Fri, 26 May 2006 22:38:17 +0000 http://www.disambiguity.com/2006/05/links-for-2006-05-26/#comment-965 yes, I did read Shelley's blog... and yes, I didn't like her approach re: linking. I was almost thinking that blogs might get an exception from this rule - seeing as historically one of their key purposes is to link elsewhere... I'm going to have to think on that some more and consider adding the 'linked in this post' list at the bottom of the page. I wonder if WordPress has a plugin that will automate that for me! :) yes, I did read Shelley’s blog… and yes, I didn’t like her approach re: linking.

I was almost thinking that blogs might get an exception from this rule - seeing as historically one of their key purposes is to link elsewhere…

I’m going to have to think on that some more and consider adding the ‘linked in this post’ list at the bottom of the page.

I wonder if WordPress has a plugin that will automate that for me!
:)

]]> By: Anne http://www.disambiguity.com/links-for-2006-05-26/#comment-963 Anne Fri, 26 May 2006 12:58:46 +0000 http://www.disambiguity.com/2006/05/links-for-2006-05-26/#comment-963 did you ever read Shelley Powers' Burningbird weblog? She always had links listed inline as well as after the post ("linked in this post"). It was pretty cool. I think I'd like to implement something like that on my blog. did you ever read Shelley Powers’ Burningbird weblog? She always had links listed inline as well as after the post (”linked in this post”). It was pretty cool. I think I’d like to implement something like that on my blog.

]]>