<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: &#8216;But is expanded choice good or bad?&#8217;, from The Paradox of Choice by Barry Schwartz</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.disambiguity.com/but-is-expanded-choice-good-or-bad-from-the-paradox-of-choice-by-barry-schwartz/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.disambiguity.com/but-is-expanded-choice-good-or-bad-from-the-paradox-of-choice-by-barry-schwartz/</link>
	<description>Observing, reflecting, designing.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 23:14:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adrian Chan</title>
		<link>http://www.disambiguity.com/but-is-expanded-choice-good-or-bad-from-the-paradox-of-choice-by-barry-schwartz/comment-page-1/#comment-248792</link>
		<dc:creator>Adrian Chan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Aug 2009 00:09:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.disambiguity.com/?p=904#comment-248792</guid>
		<description>Leisa, 

Aside from the explanation that this is an information selection or choice problem, which is reasonable, I wonder if there&#039;s another explanation. To wit, that faced with a narrower set of choices, we might tend to assume they are made by experts, have credibility, and are special? Special &quot;for us,&quot; even? Reviews are not &quot;for us,&quot; recommendations are &quot;for us.&quot; I&#039;m only conjecturing, but I don&#039;t buy the idea that choice is the best solution in all cases. I think luxury brands get this (which would include gourmet menus). 

cheers, 
a</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Leisa, </p>
<p>Aside from the explanation that this is an information selection or choice problem, which is reasonable, I wonder if there&#8217;s another explanation. To wit, that faced with a narrower set of choices, we might tend to assume they are made by experts, have credibility, and are special? Special &#8220;for us,&#8221; even? Reviews are not &#8220;for us,&#8221; recommendations are &#8220;for us.&#8221; I&#8217;m only conjecturing, but I don&#8217;t buy the idea that choice is the best solution in all cases. I think luxury brands get this (which would include gourmet menus). </p>
<p>cheers,<br />
a</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: carla</title>
		<link>http://www.disambiguity.com/but-is-expanded-choice-good-or-bad-from-the-paradox-of-choice-by-barry-schwartz/comment-page-1/#comment-248368</link>
		<dc:creator>carla</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Jul 2009 05:54:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.disambiguity.com/?p=904#comment-248368</guid>
		<description>I remember a news article a few years ago that talked about how an abundance of choice caused a behaviour known as maximising - where a choice/decision is actually never made because the options are so wide and varied. I just googled it and found this article, by Schwartz too (and others). It quotes the jam study:

http://www.swarthmore.edu/SocSci/bschwar1/maximizing.pdf

I guess that&#039;s one reason why everyone loved the iPod. In an over-saturated media age they could just focus on one thing - music.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I remember a news article a few years ago that talked about how an abundance of choice caused a behaviour known as maximising &#8211; where a choice/decision is actually never made because the options are so wide and varied. I just googled it and found this article, by Schwartz too (and others). It quotes the jam study:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.swarthmore.edu/SocSci/bschwar1/maximizing.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://www.swarthmore.edu/SocSci/bschwar1/maximizing.pdf</a></p>
<p>I guess that&#8217;s one reason why everyone loved the iPod. In an over-saturated media age they could just focus on one thing &#8211; music.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

