<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: blog gardening (categories)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.disambiguity.com/blog-gardening-categories/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.disambiguity.com/blog-gardening-categories/</link>
	<description>pretty design pending</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 15:15:22 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Gerry</title>
		<link>http://www.disambiguity.com/blog-gardening-categories/#comment-57125</link>
		<dc:creator>Gerry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2007 03:04:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.disambiguity.com/2006/10/22/blog-gardening-categories/#comment-57125</guid>
		<description>Give it another ten months and you will probably want to re-think your categories again. Change is natural. We gardeners, above all people know that.

I am a gardener not a blogger. At least I don't write them, I read them. Reading, writing and gardening all at the same time? Too much for one old man.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Give it another ten months and you will probably want to re-think your categories again. Change is natural. We gardeners, above all people know that.</p>
<p>I am a gardener not a blogger. At least I don&#8217;t write them, I read them. Reading, writing and gardening all at the same time? Too much for one old man.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gardening Junkie</title>
		<link>http://www.disambiguity.com/blog-gardening-categories/#comment-55926</link>
		<dc:creator>Gardening Junkie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Dec 2007 16:39:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.disambiguity.com/2006/10/22/blog-gardening-categories/#comment-55926</guid>
		<description>If managing and organizing your categories helps create a better blog, great.  In the meantime, keep supplying us with wonderful photos and super information! :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If managing and organizing your categories helps create a better blog, great.  In the meantime, keep supplying us with wonderful photos and super information! <img src='http://www.disambiguity.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sewrtuiy</title>
		<link>http://www.disambiguity.com/blog-gardening-categories/#comment-25351</link>
		<dc:creator>sewrtuiy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Jul 2007 03:10:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.disambiguity.com/2006/10/22/blog-gardening-categories/#comment-25351</guid>
		<description>Do you buy socks online? I found &lt;a href="http://socks." rel="nofollow"&gt;hand knit sock&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do you buy socks online? I found <a href="http://socks." rel="nofollow">hand knit sock</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RandyJones</title>
		<link>http://www.disambiguity.com/blog-gardening-categories/#comment-16223</link>
		<dc:creator>RandyJones</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2007 17:53:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.disambiguity.com/2006/10/22/blog-gardening-categories/#comment-16223</guid>
		<description>Looks Like Dallas is in trouble! 
Phoenix might end up blowing them all away. 
 
PHX vs. Det. Hmmm..Could be interesting?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looks Like Dallas is in trouble!<br />
Phoenix might end up blowing them all away. </p>
<p>PHX vs. Det. Hmmm..Could be interesting?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RaymonWazerri</title>
		<link>http://www.disambiguity.com/blog-gardening-categories/#comment-15316</link>
		<dc:creator>RaymonWazerri</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Apr 2007 23:37:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.disambiguity.com/2006/10/22/blog-gardening-categories/#comment-15316</guid>
		<description>Hey, 
I love what you'e doing! 
Don't ever change and best of luck. 
 
Raymon W.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey,<br />
I love what you&#8217;e doing!<br />
Don&#8217;t ever change and best of luck. </p>
<p>Raymon W.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sean coon</title>
		<link>http://www.disambiguity.com/blog-gardening-categories/#comment-6813</link>
		<dc:creator>sean coon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Oct 2006 18:39:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.disambiguity.com/2006/10/22/blog-gardening-categories/#comment-6813</guid>
		<description>i hear you about tags in the column, but there's actually one column-tag layout that i've come across that i think works very well. take a look at the &lt;a href="http://tedblog.typepad.com/tedblog/" rel="nofollow"&gt;TED blog&lt;/a&gt;.

most people don't navigate my tag cloud, as much as check it out to get a feel for what i write about (at least that's what my mint stats show). but i've been thinking about following the TED layout, as it removes the distinction between categories and tags, yet exposes enough meta-data to both pique curiosity and present an editorial position.

IA relics like us probably hold onto categories from the days of crafting CV's (what's the parent/child relationship?), but tag co-occurance -- relational/associative relationships -- is a much stronger way to present information.

well, at least today it is ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i hear you about tags in the column, but there&#8217;s actually one column-tag layout that i&#8217;ve come across that i think works very well. take a look at the <a href="http://tedblog.typepad.com/tedblog/" rel="nofollow">TED blog</a>.</p>
<p>most people don&#8217;t navigate my tag cloud, as much as check it out to get a feel for what i write about (at least that&#8217;s what my mint stats show). but i&#8217;ve been thinking about following the TED layout, as it removes the distinction between categories and tags, yet exposes enough meta-data to both pique curiosity and present an editorial position.</p>
<p>IA relics like us probably hold onto categories from the days of crafting CV&#8217;s (what&#8217;s the parent/child relationship?), but tag co-occurance &#8212; relational/associative relationships &#8212; is a much stronger way to present information.</p>
<p>well, at least today it is <img src='http://www.disambiguity.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: leisa.reichelt</title>
		<link>http://www.disambiguity.com/blog-gardening-categories/#comment-6812</link>
		<dc:creator>leisa.reichelt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Oct 2006 12:36:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.disambiguity.com/2006/10/22/blog-gardening-categories/#comment-6812</guid>
		<description>hey Sean,
I just went to check out your blog and I'm liking that 'Discover' page you have with the tag cloud. Nice one.

I think that's starting to do what I was thinking about earlier - giving more exposure to posts that would otherwise be buried in time (assuming that people don't use categories, which they don't seem to).
Maybe I need a tag cloud (on a separate page, like yours. I'm not a fan of the 'tag cloud in a column' approach).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hey Sean,<br />
I just went to check out your blog and I&#8217;m liking that &#8216;Discover&#8217; page you have with the tag cloud. Nice one.</p>
<p>I think that&#8217;s starting to do what I was thinking about earlier - giving more exposure to posts that would otherwise be buried in time (assuming that people don&#8217;t use categories, which they don&#8217;t seem to).<br />
Maybe I need a tag cloud (on a separate page, like yours. I&#8217;m not a fan of the &#8216;tag cloud in a column&#8217; approach).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anne 2.0 &#187; Blog Archive &#187; links for 2006-10-22</title>
		<link>http://www.disambiguity.com/blog-gardening-categories/#comment-6807</link>
		<dc:creator>Anne 2.0 &#187; Blog Archive &#187; links for 2006-10-22</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Oct 2006 23:56:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.disambiguity.com/2006/10/22/blog-gardening-categories/#comment-6807</guid>
		<description>[...] disambiguity - » blog gardening (categories) Leisa just refactored her blog categories. I&#8217;ve been thinking of doing the same. Categories seem important, but only for the blogger and for occasional or first-time readers. RSS subscribers don&#8217;t need them. (tags: blogging categories information-architecture) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] disambiguity - » blog gardening (categories) Leisa just refactored her blog categories. I&#8217;ve been thinking of doing the same. Categories seem important, but only for the blogger and for occasional or first-time readers. RSS subscribers don&#8217;t need them. (tags: blogging categories information-architecture) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sean coon</title>
		<link>http://www.disambiguity.com/blog-gardening-categories/#comment-6801</link>
		<dc:creator>sean coon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Oct 2006 16:11:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.disambiguity.com/2006/10/22/blog-gardening-categories/#comment-6801</guid>
		<description>thanks for the post. it's not often that i stumble onto another IA's take on curating their blog.

categories are probably the least navigated links on my blog as well, but i don't use them for that explicit purpose. at a glance (or squint) they represent my editorial position, so i don't have to write a lengthy "what this blog is about" section. they also pick up "the internets" travellers from google, like a fishing net, so they -- as well as tag index pages -- are worth it in the end.

i'm currently in the midst of turning two of my categories into tags (activism and music) because they're not broad enough. i was getting tired of raking through my old posts, but you've given me a bit of motivation, now. ;) thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>thanks for the post. it&#8217;s not often that i stumble onto another IA&#8217;s take on curating their blog.</p>
<p>categories are probably the least navigated links on my blog as well, but i don&#8217;t use them for that explicit purpose. at a glance (or squint) they represent my editorial position, so i don&#8217;t have to write a lengthy &#8220;what this blog is about&#8221; section. they also pick up &#8220;the internets&#8221; travellers from google, like a fishing net, so they &#8212; as well as tag index pages &#8212; are worth it in the end.</p>
<p>i&#8217;m currently in the midst of turning two of my categories into tags (activism and music) because they&#8217;re not broad enough. i was getting tired of raking through my old posts, but you&#8217;ve given me a bit of motivation, now. <img src='http://www.disambiguity.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anne</title>
		<link>http://www.disambiguity.com/blog-gardening-categories/#comment-6799</link>
		<dc:creator>Anne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Oct 2006 14:03:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.disambiguity.com/2006/10/22/blog-gardening-categories/#comment-6799</guid>
		<description>I was thinking this morning that I needed to rework my categories. I think they have some usefulness, both for the blogger and for the occasional reader, less so for subscribers of course. I tagged my posts for a little while, but stopped doing that on switching to wordpress. A blog needs something, tags or categories, for people who browse over occasionally. It's awful to come upon a blog you're interested in and have to go through time-based archives to read past stuff.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was thinking this morning that I needed to rework my categories. I think they have some usefulness, both for the blogger and for the occasional reader, less so for subscribers of course. I tagged my posts for a little while, but stopped doing that on switching to wordpress. A blog needs something, tags or categories, for people who browse over occasionally. It&#8217;s awful to come upon a blog you&#8217;re interested in and have to go through time-based archives to read past stuff.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
