<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ambient Exposure</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.disambiguity.com/ambient-exposure/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.disambiguity.com/ambient-exposure/</link>
	<description>pretty design pending</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 06 Jul 2008 06:44:20 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Transnets &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Sur/sous-veillance et vigilance participative</title>
		<link>http://www.disambiguity.com/ambient-exposure/#comment-91513</link>
		<dc:creator>Transnets &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Sur/sous-veillance et vigilance participative</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 16:25:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.disambiguity.com/ambient-exposure/#comment-91513</guid>
		<description>[...] ambiante» [si vous avez une meillere traduction à proposer n&#8217;heesitez pas] (ambient exposure ) au double sens de ce qu’on affiche et de ce à quoi on s’expose. Les «amis» étant [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] ambiante» [si vous avez une meillere traduction à proposer n&#8217;heesitez pas] (ambient exposure ) au double sens de ce qu’on affiche et de ce à quoi on s’expose. Les «amis» étant [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Day Planner</title>
		<link>http://www.disambiguity.com/ambient-exposure/#comment-84808</link>
		<dc:creator>Day Planner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Apr 2008 21:09:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.disambiguity.com/ambient-exposure/#comment-84808</guid>
		<description>This is so timely. A friend of mine just asked me to join Twitter (and I had no idea what it was). It seems like a little research is helpful when implementing new technology.

Although I'm fairly comfortable with being online, I'm definitely concerned about revealing too much. 
Thanks for exploring this important area of ambient intimacy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is so timely. A friend of mine just asked me to join Twitter (and I had no idea what it was). It seems like a little research is helpful when implementing new technology.</p>
<p>Although I&#8217;m fairly comfortable with being online, I&#8217;m definitely concerned about revealing too much.<br />
Thanks for exploring this important area of ambient intimacy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan Hoffman</title>
		<link>http://www.disambiguity.com/ambient-exposure/#comment-84787</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan Hoffman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Apr 2008 19:14:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.disambiguity.com/ambient-exposure/#comment-84787</guid>
		<description>Perhaps the core of the issue here is that "ambient intimacy", despite being an intriguing notion on a buzzword level, is an inherently contradictory idea -- "ambience" and "intimacy" are opposites that really can't be reconciled. In your original "Ambient Intimacy" post, you seemed to equate intimacy with the twitter-enabled remote awareness of the ongoing, small details of peoples' lives. But I'm not sure being aware of what someone is doing or even thinking all day (had a donut for breakfast; going into a meeting now; my boss's tie is really ugly, wish I could tell him) really constitutes intimacy. I remember a college creative writing course I took, where the instructor told a student that his writing wasn't creating any concrete sense of his characters as "real" people. In desperation, the student wrote a store that was essentially a serial narrative of his character's every action from the minute he got out of of bed. Unsurprisingly, the result was about as far from a "flesh and blood" character as you could imagine. I think your reluctance to twitter about your pregnancy simply represents a totally reasonable intuition about what true intimacy is. The things that we feel most deeply and the most special moments in our lives are by definition not "ambient". Far from being "authentic", I think "broadcasting" those experiences via twitter would simply leach the authenticity and intimacy out of them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Perhaps the core of the issue here is that &#8220;ambient intimacy&#8221;, despite being an intriguing notion on a buzzword level, is an inherently contradictory idea &#8212; &#8220;ambience&#8221; and &#8220;intimacy&#8221; are opposites that really can&#8217;t be reconciled. In your original &#8220;Ambient Intimacy&#8221; post, you seemed to equate intimacy with the twitter-enabled remote awareness of the ongoing, small details of peoples&#8217; lives. But I&#8217;m not sure being aware of what someone is doing or even thinking all day (had a donut for breakfast; going into a meeting now; my boss&#8217;s tie is really ugly, wish I could tell him) really constitutes intimacy. I remember a college creative writing course I took, where the instructor told a student that his writing wasn&#8217;t creating any concrete sense of his characters as &#8220;real&#8221; people. In desperation, the student wrote a store that was essentially a serial narrative of his character&#8217;s every action from the minute he got out of of bed. Unsurprisingly, the result was about as far from a &#8220;flesh and blood&#8221; character as you could imagine. I think your reluctance to twitter about your pregnancy simply represents a totally reasonable intuition about what true intimacy is. The things that we feel most deeply and the most special moments in our lives are by definition not &#8220;ambient&#8221;. Far from being &#8220;authentic&#8221;, I think &#8220;broadcasting&#8221; those experiences via twitter would simply leach the authenticity and intimacy out of them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bwl zwei null &#187; Twitter Ambivalenz (und Meinungsänderung meinerseits!)</title>
		<link>http://www.disambiguity.com/ambient-exposure/#comment-84691</link>
		<dc:creator>bwl zwei null &#187; Twitter Ambivalenz (und Meinungsänderung meinerseits!)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Apr 2008 06:01:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.disambiguity.com/ambient-exposure/#comment-84691</guid>
		<description>[...] Und als Letztes wäre da noch dieses Grundrauschen. Also die (banalen) Mitteilungen darüber, wer gerade Kaffee kocht oder unter die Dusche geht. Mir geht das immer noch auf die Nerven. Aber es hat wohl seinen Platz in einer Welt, in der Beziehungen immer mehr auch über große Distanzen gepflegt sein wollen, weil nicht mehr alle im gleichen Dorf leben. Twitter schafft es offenbar, so etwas wie Nähe (oder gar Intimität) herzustellen, was auf Unbeteiligte aber oft kurios oder gar irritierend wirkt und auch Nachteile haben kann, wie Leisa Reichelt (disambiguity) reflektiert. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Und als Letztes wäre da noch dieses Grundrauschen. Also die (banalen) Mitteilungen darüber, wer gerade Kaffee kocht oder unter die Dusche geht. Mir geht das immer noch auf die Nerven. Aber es hat wohl seinen Platz in einer Welt, in der Beziehungen immer mehr auch über große Distanzen gepflegt sein wollen, weil nicht mehr alle im gleichen Dorf leben. Twitter schafft es offenbar, so etwas wie Nähe (oder gar Intimität) herzustellen, was auf Unbeteiligte aber oft kurios oder gar irritierend wirkt und auch Nachteile haben kann, wie Leisa Reichelt (disambiguity) reflektiert. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Antonio Gould</title>
		<link>http://www.disambiguity.com/ambient-exposure/#comment-84597</link>
		<dc:creator>Antonio Gould</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Apr 2008 12:00:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.disambiguity.com/ambient-exposure/#comment-84597</guid>
		<description>If we think about this in terms of how to tag the "Social Graph", what's coming out for me is that it won't be along those old traditional lines: "friends", "co-workers" and so on.

Actually, everyone's developing fairly complex carve-ups of their contacts, deciding who's in each group and collectively finding particular ways in which they communicate with that set of people. 

I also find that I'm consistently coming across new dilemmas about how much or little to share - and there aren't really any social norms to go by yet! It's one of the most fascinating things to me about the emergence of social media and I guess that the norms us "early adopters" are discovering in place now may stick around for quite some time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If we think about this in terms of how to tag the &#8220;Social Graph&#8221;, what&#8217;s coming out for me is that it won&#8217;t be along those old traditional lines: &#8220;friends&#8221;, &#8220;co-workers&#8221; and so on.</p>
<p>Actually, everyone&#8217;s developing fairly complex carve-ups of their contacts, deciding who&#8217;s in each group and collectively finding particular ways in which they communicate with that set of people. </p>
<p>I also find that I&#8217;m consistently coming across new dilemmas about how much or little to share - and there aren&#8217;t really any social norms to go by yet! It&#8217;s one of the most fascinating things to me about the emergence of social media and I guess that the norms us &#8220;early adopters&#8221; are discovering in place now may stick around for quite some time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Livia Labate</title>
		<link>http://www.disambiguity.com/ambient-exposure/#comment-84573</link>
		<dc:creator>Livia Labate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Apr 2008 06:13:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.disambiguity.com/ambient-exposure/#comment-84573</guid>
		<description>Doh, I meant http://tweetstats.com/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Doh, I meant <a href="http://tweetstats.com/" rel="nofollow">http://tweetstats.com/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Livia Labate</title>
		<link>http://www.disambiguity.com/ambient-exposure/#comment-84572</link>
		<dc:creator>Livia Labate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Apr 2008 06:12:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.disambiguity.com/ambient-exposure/#comment-84572</guid>
		<description>PS: I came across TwittStats.com this evening and thought it was the coolest thing. Then I saw this article and realized how invasive people can make it http://www.centernetworks.com/tweetstats-twitter-stats-research-spy</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>PS: I came across TwittStats.com this evening and thought it was the coolest thing. Then I saw this article and realized how invasive people can make it <a href="http://www.centernetworks.com/tweetstats-twitter-stats-research-spy" rel="nofollow">http://www.centernetworks.com/tweetstats-twitter-stats-research-spy</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anne Truitt Zelenka &#187; links for 2008-04-06</title>
		<link>http://www.disambiguity.com/ambient-exposure/#comment-84541</link>
		<dc:creator>Anne Truitt Zelenka &#187; links for 2008-04-06</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Apr 2008 23:39:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.disambiguity.com/ambient-exposure/#comment-84541</guid>
		<description>[...] disambiguity - » Ambient Exposure &#8220;Exposure in terms of disclosing information of course, but also exposure in the way that a trader might think of it - a vulnerability, a risk associated with taking a position that could, potentially, result in loss or harm.&#8221; (tags: ambientintimacy exposure vulnerability facebook twitter privacy presence) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] disambiguity - » Ambient Exposure &#8220;Exposure in terms of disclosing information of course, but also exposure in the way that a trader might think of it - a vulnerability, a risk associated with taking a position that could, potentially, result in loss or harm.&#8221; (tags: ambientintimacy exposure vulnerability facebook twitter privacy presence) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Livia Labate</title>
		<link>http://www.disambiguity.com/ambient-exposure/#comment-84537</link>
		<dc:creator>Livia Labate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Apr 2008 23:03:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.disambiguity.com/ambient-exposure/#comment-84537</guid>
		<description>This is interesting -- I wondered why you got quieter on Twitter and I was very surprised to learn you had had a baby since I heard nothing at all about it though I've been following you on twitter for a whole year now :). I was thinking if it had been that you had been busy, if twitter just became less relevant to you or if you felt you were too overexposed. My bet was on #1. :)

I think many of us are wondering about the same implications and the reaction I'm seeing more often is people pulling away, being more discretionary. While that's sensible, I think we lose a lot of the fun and the benefit of having ubiquitous technologies that just work for us. If we have to think about them too much, I feel it defeats the purpose somewhat.

I don't mean to say that relying on a system implies we stop thinking about the consequences of our acts, but it's the balance of being confortable enough with the system and aware enough of what your actions mean in the future.

My strategy has been for a while, to use personas. Ok, sorta. I have these prototypical people that represent folks on my list of contacts (representing a biz partner, a colleague, a friend, people I don't know, etc), and when I post something I imagine them reading it. It's good enough a filter for me to establish the balance between Ambient Exposure (in my level of comfort with what I present to the world) and Ambient Intimacy (my desire to be social with certain frequency).

While this is a habit for me, I know I don't do it every time. So when you see me regurgitate 6 messages in a row because I'm running around excited doing something or batch-responding to people, I'll very likelly be going "oh crap, I just spammed all my followers" and I'll feel bad. If I share something that I regret, I'll delete it. The world is forgiving enough - if someone saw it for a split second it doesn't matter, it won't haunt me for the rest of my life.

So, while I'm seeing a lot of people pulling away because of these concerns, my idea has been to push those boundaries further for myself (I'm an introvert and I'm shy so this is a good way for me to deal with that in an environment I don't feel threatened by). 

While I was wondering if you had been busy and therefore twittering less, I started twittering more regularly and it has affected my day to day. Because I'm more exposed there, I've had more conversations in person at work and with friends and more interesting topics have oppened up. People that were acquaintances have become closer, people who thought I was too much, stopped following. I am really enjoying the experiment. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is interesting &#8212; I wondered why you got quieter on Twitter and I was very surprised to learn you had had a baby since I heard nothing at all about it though I&#8217;ve been following you on twitter for a whole year now :). I was thinking if it had been that you had been busy, if twitter just became less relevant to you or if you felt you were too overexposed. My bet was on #1. <img src='http://www.disambiguity.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>I think many of us are wondering about the same implications and the reaction I&#8217;m seeing more often is people pulling away, being more discretionary. While that&#8217;s sensible, I think we lose a lot of the fun and the benefit of having ubiquitous technologies that just work for us. If we have to think about them too much, I feel it defeats the purpose somewhat.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t mean to say that relying on a system implies we stop thinking about the consequences of our acts, but it&#8217;s the balance of being confortable enough with the system and aware enough of what your actions mean in the future.</p>
<p>My strategy has been for a while, to use personas. Ok, sorta. I have these prototypical people that represent folks on my list of contacts (representing a biz partner, a colleague, a friend, people I don&#8217;t know, etc), and when I post something I imagine them reading it. It&#8217;s good enough a filter for me to establish the balance between Ambient Exposure (in my level of comfort with what I present to the world) and Ambient Intimacy (my desire to be social with certain frequency).</p>
<p>While this is a habit for me, I know I don&#8217;t do it every time. So when you see me regurgitate 6 messages in a row because I&#8217;m running around excited doing something or batch-responding to people, I&#8217;ll very likelly be going &#8220;oh crap, I just spammed all my followers&#8221; and I&#8217;ll feel bad. If I share something that I regret, I&#8217;ll delete it. The world is forgiving enough - if someone saw it for a split second it doesn&#8217;t matter, it won&#8217;t haunt me for the rest of my life.</p>
<p>So, while I&#8217;m seeing a lot of people pulling away because of these concerns, my idea has been to push those boundaries further for myself (I&#8217;m an introvert and I&#8217;m shy so this is a good way for me to deal with that in an environment I don&#8217;t feel threatened by). </p>
<p>While I was wondering if you had been busy and therefore twittering less, I started twittering more regularly and it has affected my day to day. Because I&#8217;m more exposed there, I&#8217;ve had more conversations in person at work and with friends and more interesting topics have oppened up. People that were acquaintances have become closer, people who thought I was too much, stopped following. I am really enjoying the experiment. <img src='http://www.disambiguity.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
