I hadn’t seen these before – a bunch of templates that AD have on their site as part of their ‘Complete User Experience’ training. I’ve only taken a look at one or two and I don’t think they’re that great… but could be a good starting point if you’re looking to start building up your templates.
This research “explored how many sites currently use breadcrumbs as a navigation element, what conventions have developed, and whether users notice, use, and understand what breadcrumbs are. “
A great post by Darren Rowse about a blog that he used to love that has sold out and let him down… (and also of the relationship between a blog and it’s readers).
an interesting look at the crazy world of resolution
another classic from OK/Cancel :)
I mentioned before Kevin Lim’s BestBlogForward meme. Here’s my contribution :)
Judging by visits and comments, there are probably three blog posts that stand out as ‘most popular’ from this blog. They are:
- Design is a good idea (on ugliness, with some thoughts on the DesignGuys Craigs List realignment)
- The six species of information architect
- Women of 2.0 (Get Up, Stand Up)
- User Experience and Cognitive Pleasures (there’s easy, then there’s *experience*)
Based on my experience with these posts… here’s what I’ve learned about how blog posts get popular. (Note: that’s very different to ‘how to write popular blog posts’. I’m not the person to write that post, I don’t think.)
- If you’re a mid-to-low alphabet lister like myself… you need the network to make anything you write widely read (or viewed, at least). In each of these cases, I’m indebted to at least one blogger much more popular than myself to get eyeballs on these posts. Once one of these ‘popular’ bloggers links to you, then it becomes a bit of a snowball effect (or a meme, I guess… hence TechMeme). Interestingly, I’ve had posts on TechMeme a few times now and get virtually no traffic as a result. Bloggers who I really have to thank include Scrivs at 9 Rules, Kathy Sierra, Ben Barren, Anne Zelenka.
- If your blog title has a number in it, then it is more likely to be popular. No matter what people say about blogposts that are lists (and it’s often not good), there’s something about a number that sounds authoritative and that people can’t seem to resist reading and linking to. As I discovered, it doesn’t even matter if the number you choose is different to the actual number of species (my six species was actually seven, but hardly anyone mentioned that – thank goodness!). I don’t want to recommend overdoing the ‘number’ posts though… I haven’t done one before or since the six species… I should probably think up another one though :)
- Some conversations never die and seem to be eternally popular. In my case, my brushes with the “Ugly Design debate” and the “Where are the Women Bloggers” debate were a lot more high impact than I’d expected. At the time of writing, I wasn’t really aware that these discussions had been going on in the blogosphere for years already, and since I’ve written them I’ve seen them bubble up from time to time.
- There is no relationship between the length of your blog title and it’s popularity.
What were the stories behind these posts? Well, I can honestly say that none of them were written with ‘traffic’ in mind. Each of them came from conversations I was having online and offline (Six Species, Women of 2.0), things that were bugging me at the time (Design is a good idea), or someone writing a blog post that consolidated some of my thoughts in a new way and inspired me to post my interpretation of what they were saying (User Experience & Cognitive Pleasure).
Based on my experience with TechMeme, I’d say that if you want to be ‘popular’, it’s probably not that difficult. Write about what everyone else is writing about as soon as you possibly can, and – with bit of strategic promotion and A-Lister flattery – get drawn into the linking maelstrom.
Is this what you want your blog to be though? For me, absolutely no. Occasionally there’s something ‘topical’ that I think is exciting or interesting or annoying, and that is relevant to the work that I do (or my life I guess). A lot of the time, the topics that the blogosphere carries on with are repetitive, reactive, and irrelevant to what I’m interested in.
For me, I’d much rather have a small band of people who read my blog reasonably regularly, and who find what I write to be somewhat thought provoking – either to help them think about something in a new way, or to introduce them to something that they might not have seen before. I’m much more interested in people reading and interacting in a conversation than I am in having thousands of anonymous visitors drop in for a moment, then drop out. (On a slight tangent, that’s why I don’t have Adsense or any other advertising on my blog).
So, popular blogposts. I like it when I have a post that’s popular because I get to ‘meet’ new people who find my blog that way… but I don’t write for popularity or traffic.
I’d encourage *everyone* to write for reasons other than popularity. But that’s just me.
If you *really* want to learn about popularity (and making money from your blog), go see Darren Rowse. (and ponder on the fact that 73%* of his readers are male… more on that later perhaps)
* based on results of poll at time of writing. Results were even more skewed towards men last time I checked so perhaps women bloggers just have better things to do on the weekend!)
Image credit: Borrowed from Kevin
Technorati Tags: bestblogforward
After years of being disparaged by the software dev. community, the waterfall methodology is back with a vengenance…. well, kind of. Don’t be bored by methodology, it’s actually funny!
Bill Scott’s great article on mouse hovers – Use hover to create a more lightweight but engaging way to cue the user to hidden functionality. Use it as a way to provide just-in-time details. Use it to keep your page visually simpler …
along the lines of the anti-pattern: learn usability and good Web design by looking at bad Web design
Livia Labate has a whole bunch of the IA Summit presentations recorded and ready for your listening pleasure on her blog.
From the Online International Journal of Usability Studies … this is a bit too mathematical for me. I’ve never really been that into statistics… well, not to this degree. What about you? How important/valuable do you think stats are to usability testing?
another from the Online International Journal of Usability Studies. I have to admit that I’m a little skeptical about the benefits of eyetracking… when thinking of bang for buck. It’s rarely something that I consider using (except when trying to convince someone they need to do something about usability on their site). What are your thoughts on eyetracking?
Are you a trouble maker? Here’s a new sound that’s supposed to target under 25s (aka troublemakers, of course). Can you hear it? I can! Hoorah! I’m a troublemaker! via Cameron Reilly
“Wondering how many people have been knocking about your feed just now? Check out this listing of the last 25 hits to your feed displayed by date, time and user agent.’ Very cool. I always wondered what was going on with RSS. Now I have one more set of stats to obsess over ;)
to celebrate his 1000th blog post, Kevin Lim is having a meme contest – find your most popular blog post, blog the story behind the post, and tag it ‘bestblogforward’ and Kevin might have a prize for you! I’m going to get to this on the weekend if I have a moment.
Have you used Lucid Spec? What did you think? I’m in the process of playing around with a few different types of software to help make my work easier/more enjoyable/more effective.
continuing my slightly nervous foray into usability for opensource projects I signed up here today…. not sure how active it is … further investigation pending